Birthright Citizenship, also known as jus soli or “right of the soil,” is the automatic granting of citizenship to any children born within a nation’s borders or territories.
The only two countries in the developed world which offer birthright citizenship are the United States and … Canada! No European country offers birthright citizenship.
Why Does the U.S. Offer Birthright Citizenship?
The U.S. did not always offer birthright citizenship. The issue of citizenship was brought into focus by the infamous Dred Scott Supreme Court ruling in 1857 that essentially declared that black people — even the daughters and sons of freed slaves — were not U.S. citizens!
Birthright citizenship in the United States was first made law by the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, which was enacted in 1868. The 14th Amendment granted legal status to emancipated slaves and provides that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
The Supreme Court affirmed the Constitution’s authority on this issue in 1898 by ruling that citizenship is a right offered unconditionally to all born on U.S. soil. In United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the Court ruled that a child born in the United States of Chinese citizens, who had at the time a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and who were carrying on business there other than for the Chinese government, automatically became a U.S. citizen.
In this climate of popular anti-Chinese sentiment, in the 1880s and 1890s Congress enacted a series of “Chinese Exclusion Acts.” Chinese already in the U.S. were allowed to stay, but they were ineligible for naturalization and, if they left the U.S. and later wished to return, they needed to apply anew and obtain approval again.
In the United States v. Wong Kim Ark case, the Supreme Court acknowledged that if Wong was a U.S. citizen, “the … ‘Chinese Exclusion Acts,’ prohibiting persons of the Chinese race, and especially Chinese laborers, from coming into the United States, do not and cannot apply to him.”
In 1942 the Native Sons of the Golden West filed a case (Regan v. King) to challenge the citizenship status of roughly 2,600 U.S.-born persons of Japanese ancestry. A federal district court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the plaintiffs, citing Wong Kim Ark as a controlling precedent, and the Supreme Court declined to hear the case. Since then, there has been no successful legal challenge to overturn Wong Kim Ark.
Birthright citizenship is now codified in federal statute at 8 U.S.C. § 1401.
Which Developed Countries Have Repealed Birthright Citizenship?
The following countries repealed birthright citizenship:
Australia repealed in 2007.
New Zealand repealed in 2005.
Ireland repealed in 2005.
France repealed in 1993.
India repealed in 1987.
Malta repealed in 1989.
United Kingdom repealed in 1983.
Portugal repealed in 1981.
Which Countries Have Retained Birthright Citizenship?
The majority of the world’s nations do not offer birthright citizenship. Most of the countries that still offer birthright citizenship are in Latin and South America. They include Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Pakistan, and Costa Rica.
What do you think? Should the United States repeal birthright citizenship? Why or why not?
Can come to the United States for one day have a baby and expect full benefits for that child the day they get out the hospital and go back to their country. Really
I did not know. Thank you for this information.
Yes, the United States should repeal birthright citizenship. Repealing this incentive will be the first step to solve our immigration problems. This birthright citizenship invites, encourages the influx of illegal immigration, overwhelms our social services, encourages the abusive work environment for the working illegal immigrants by employers, and the list goes on.