Personal Injury Blog

Metrolink, Train Operator Battle over Responsibility for 2008 Accident

September 4th, 2011
metrolink accident 2008

Metrolink accident that killed twenty-five people and injured more than 100 others

Southern California’s commuter rail agency Metrolink and the train operator in charge during the 2008 metrolink  accident near Chatsworth, Los Angeles are engaged in a dispute over financial responsibility for the fatal crash.

The dispute centers on each party’s financial liability in the 2008 accident that killed twenty-five people and injured more than 100 others.  Metrolink and the train operator French company Veolia Environment are arguing over their share of the $200 million settlement offered to people injured in the collision, as well as families of those were killed in the accident. Veolia Environment was contracted with Metrolink through its subsidiary Connex.  The train engineer at the controls of the Metrolink train at the time of the accident was an employee of Veolia.

Earlier this year, Veolia claimed that at the time of the contract, Metrolink had promised to pay all claims arising out of any accident.  According to Veolia, Metrolink promised to pay all claims without any limitation and regardless of clause.  However, after the Chatsworth collision took place, and when it became apparent that claims would run into the hundreds of millions of dollars, Veolia found that Metrolink had just $150 million in liability coverage.  Under federal law, Metrolink’s liability is capped at $200 million.  With Metrolink running short of insurance coverage, it fell back to Veolia Environment to come up with the remaining $50 million in order to complete the $200 million compensation fund.

California legislators asked Veolia to pay more than its share of the compensation fund, taking into consideration the severe injuries suffered by many of the victims of the crash, and the long-term expenses involved in their care.  However, Veolia has refused to pay more, and has informed California legislators about Metrolink’s contractual obligations.   Metrolink fired back against Veolia in a letter sent to Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer.  According to Metrolink, Veolia has failed to take responsibility for its actions.

Last month, a judge divided a $200 million settlement among more than 100 plaintiffs.  But California train accident lawyers believe that the settlement was millions of dollars short of the amount needed to cover future medical care for these patients.

On September 12, 2008, a Metrolink train crashed into a freight train near Chatsworth, Los Angeles.  An investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board found that the accident was caused because the engineer at the controls of the Metrolink train was distracted and ran a red light, resulting in a head-on collision between the freight train and the commuter train.  Twenty five people were killed in the tragedy, and dozens more were injured, many of them left with serious life altering injuries, like spinal cord injuries and brain injuries. Veolia alleges that while its engineer’s conduct contributed to the crash, there were other factors too that were also responsible for the tragedy.


Leave a reply



Share This Page With A Friend
Find The Reeves Law Group On

Latest Review

The Reeves Law Group
Excellent, highly recommended

"I was very pleased with my overall experience with The Reeves Law Group. The staff was friendly and helpful, and my attorney was skillful and aggressive in getting an excellent settlement recovery for me, including reimbursement for my lost income."

- Camilla C. Castagna 5.0

FreeConsultation

24 Hours
EASY & CONFIDENTIAL CLICK HERE ›
SPEAK TO A LAWYER NOW
1-800-644-8000

Client Testimonials

  • "I would recommend The Reeves Law Group to my family and friends for attorney representation of any bodily injury claims they might have..."

    — C.O., Los Angeles
  • "I cannot thank this firm enough. The attorneys and support staff were caring, attentive and diligent at every step of the way and produced an outstanding result in the case."

    — M.N., Orange County
  • "I am very happy with $981,932.68 The Reeves Law Group obtained for me for injuries I suffered in an automobile accident. The legal representation provided by the Reeves staff was excellent..."

    — G.D., Ventura County
  • "I appreciate the level of excellence and compassion put forth in my case. This law firm made what was stressful in the beginning a non-stressful case in the end. Thank you!"

    — J.H., Riverside
  • "I was very happy with attorney Pakiz of your office, who worked very diligently and was very courteous with me. I would not hesitate to call on or recommend your office in the future."

    — T.M., Orange County
  • "I would refer The Reeves Law Group to friends and family."

    — J.K., San Diego County
  • "I found the attorneys to be compassionate for my needs and tenacious against the insurance company representatives, while working to achieve an outstanding settlement result."

    — F.H., Los Angeles County
  • "Dear Mr. Reeves: Your representation and guidance during the pendency of my injury case are very much appreciated..."

    — A.C., Santa Ana
  • "I received great service and am very happy with the way your firm handled my case."

    — J.F., Orange County
  • "Great job on the whole process. It was a fast process, and there was always someone for me to talk to."

    — D. H., Rialto
  • "We came to you from another law firm that didn't help. Your offices made us feel like we were your only clients. Thank you so much for the terrific service!"

    — R.L. and E.L., Orange County
  • "Great job - great damages recovery! Thank you Mr. Reeves and staff for quality legal representation and results in my personal injury case."

    — M.I., Riverside County