The Reeves Law Group

  • Why Choose Our Firm?
  • We have won top results in thousands of cases.
  • Hundreds of cases in the multi-million to $100,000 range.
  • More than 25 years of experience.
  • We don't charge a fee unless we win your case.
  • We make home and hospital visits.
  • Meeting locations throughout California.
  • We will treat you with courtesy, compassion and respect.

Can the Federal Government Interfere with State Marijuana Laws?

March 20, 2017







Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ Statements on Marijuana

Eight states have voted to legalize recreational marijuana. Twenty-nine states have legalized medical marijuana. Twenty-one states have decriminalized the drug. However, marijuana remains illegal under federal law as a Schedule 1 drug. Schedule 1 drugs are defined as having “no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.”

In the past, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has publicly stated his belief that “Good people don’t smoke marijuana.” As a senator, he also said last year that “marijuana is not the kind of thing that ought to be legalized… that it is, in fact, a very real danger.”

Image Source: businessinsider.com

Image Source: businessinsider.com

At his recent confirmation hearing for Attorney General, Sessions admitted that disrupting states’ legal marijuana markets by enforcing federal marijuana laws could create an undue strain on federal resources. However, Sessions also said he “won’t commit to never enforcing federal law.” Sessions acknowledged that the Department of Justice issued guidelines in 2013 that effectively left marijuana law enforcement up to individual states, but he expressed concern that the guidelines may not have been followed.

And in a radio interview last week, Sessions said, “Marijuana is against federal law, and that applies in states where they may have repealed their own anti-marijuana laws. So yes, we will enforce law in an appropriate way nationwide.”

This past week, Attorney General Sessions declared that marijuana—a drug on which no person has ever overdosed—was nearly as dangerous as heroin, a drug that killed 12,989 Americans in a single year.

Image Source: howstuffworks.com

Image Source: howstuffworks.com

On the campaign trail, Donald Trump voiced his support for legal medical marijuana. However, Trump said in June 2015 that legal recreational use was “bad,” adding he felt “strongly about it.”

Can the Federal Government Interfere with State Marijuana Laws?

In late February, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer stated, “I do believe you will see greater enforcement of it,” regarding federal drug laws. The Trump administration could take the following actions to step up enforcement:

While the Obama administration laid out in an official memo (the Cole memo) that the federal government wouldn’t interfere in states where non-medical use of marijuana is allowed, the Trump administration could rescind that guidance.

The Trump administration could prosecute large-scale recreational marijuana businesses in order to deter expansion of the entire industry.

The Trump administration could rescind the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s guidance for banks and oppose efforts to expand banking services to the marijuana industry. Historically, the marijuana industry has lacked access to banking and the loans it needs to expand.

What do you think? Should the federal government respect states’ marijuana laws, including legalization of recreational marijuana?

Posted by Mary Mock at 5:12 am - 1 comment
  • Litster

    I’m all for the federal government trumping state laws. History has shown that as a general rule, the states do not know what’s best for their citizens (civil rights come to mind). So if the law allows for the federal government to step in and override a state’s marijuana law, so be it. I just find it hypocritical that republicans, who are so gung-ho about “state’s rights” are ok with the federal government doing this. And while I’m not against the legalization of marijuana, I think there is a risk of people getting hurt by it, such as operating a vehicle under the influence of THC. And I know that establishing “intoxication” from THC using scientific methods is not easy, given how the THC metabolites will remain in a person’s systems for weeks after the drug no longer has an intoxicating effect. In contrast, operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol has a well-established scientific and legal principles and rules.

  • Find The Reeves Law Group On